|
KurdistanObserver.com
US Liberal Media Idolize Arab Baathists
Sunnis on Constitution Panel: Determined but Impugned
The New York Tiumes Aug 25, 2005
BAGHDAD, Iraq, Aug. 24 - Saleh Mutlak, the de
facto leader of the Sunni Arabs working on Iraq's constitution, sat in the
convention center here last week in a cloud of smoke so thick it was hard to
read the expression on his face. Two packs of cigarettes with different brand
names lay on the white plastic table in front of him - Rothmans and Gauloises
- and he alternated between them as he chain-smoked.
"My friends tell me to quit smoking," Mr.
Mutlak said in a rare moment of rest between negotiating sessions. "But I could
walk outside and be killed." And he laughed.
Behind Mr. Mutlak's black humor was the killing
last month of a colleague on the committee, Mijbel Sheik Issa, who was gunned
down in Baghdad along with an adviser. But his laughter also pointed to his
relentless determination and disregard for obstacles, a drive that has
repeatedly ground negotiations among the Kurds, Shiites and Americans, all of
whom desperately want a deal on the constitution, to a halt over the last two
months.
Late Wednesday night, Mr. Mutlak and his Sunni
bloc appeared to be making a last-ditch effort to rewrite provisions in the
charter on decentralizing Iraq's government and giving new powers to local
provincial councils. The decentralized system, called federalism, is bitterly
opposed by the Sunnis, who governed Iraq as a ruling minority until Saddam
Hussein's ouster in 2003. A final draft of the constitution is to be presented
to the National Assembly on Thursday.
The talks broke down again when the Sunnis drew
a hard line on the subject at hand.
"It is of no use to go on meeting with them,"
said an exasperated Ali al-Dabbagh, a Shiite member of the constitutional
committee. "They are not willing to say anything about the federalism except
'No!' "
Mr. Mutlak is one of 15 Sunnis whom American
officials insisted on adding to the constitutional committee. The hope was to
convince at least some parts of the Sunni-led insurgency that the constitution
was legitimate and that they should join the political process rather than
continue to fight. But even some Sunni leaders outside the committee now say
that what the Americans got was an enormous thorn in their side that was not
representative of most of the Sunni population.
The expansion of the committee immediately led
to questions from all sides about whether or not the new Sunni members,
including Mr. Mutlak and Mr. Issa, had connections to Mr. Hussein's Baath Party,
but the concerns were hastily swept aside in the push to make a deal on the
constitution.
"Those who chose them made a big mistake,
because they represent the Baath Party ideology, not the Sunni interests," said
Sadoon al-Duleimi, a Sunni who is Iraq's defense minister. Mr. Duleimi is a
member of perhaps the most powerful tribe in Anbar Province, which contains the
restive cities of Falluja and Ramadi and forms the heart of the insurgency.
Mr. Duleimi, speaking in an interview with an
American reporter on Wednesday afternoon, expressed little sympathy for the
American officials who are left trying to contain the damage caused by the
ceaseless discord on the committee. "If they are good or evil," he said of the
Sunnis, "that's on your side."
The colorful and urbane Sunnis on the committee
have fought with every tool they developed during their decades in power, using
their English skills, a public-relations flair and a resolve to advance their
agenda.
The accessibility and Westernized veneer of the
Sunnis are in stark contrast to the stiff reserve of some of the religious
Shiites on the committee, who glare at reporters from beneath their turbans when
they dislike a question, and the sometimes tedious single-mindedness with which
the Kurds press for their dream of autonomy in the north.
The Sunnis characterize their top priority,
derailing federalism, as nothing less than keeping Iraq intact as a nation.
"I think the final goal for all of us is Iraqi
unity," said Haseeb Aref, a Sunni member of the committee.
But the list of Sunni causes has seemed only to
grow longer as the Shiites and Kurds have asserted nearly every day that a full
agreement was at hand. The Sunni members of the committee, who are all secular,
remain particularly unhappy with provisions enshrining Islam as a principal
source of legislation and granting clerics new powers in matters of family law.
The Sunnis also continue to have reservations
about provisions on distributing the nation's oil wealth, which is concentrated
in mainly Kurdish and Shiite areas. There is also bitterness over a clause that
in effect denounces former Baathists. It is no stretch to say the Sunnis simply
do not like the constitution that their compatriots have written.
"Until now, we haven't had any solution for
this crisis," said Kamal Hamdoun, a Sunni on the committee who, as the head of
the Iraqi Bar Association, has declared that he believes that the current Iraqi
government is illegal; he says it should be dissolved because of its maneuvers
over the last 10 days to turn the document negotiated by American, Kurdish and
Shiite leaders into the official draft constitution.
"We have no deal," Mr. Hamdoun said, "and I
think we will never have a deal."
He compared the American, Kurdish and Shiite
negotiators to pre-Islamic pagans who created images of their gods by pressing
together moist dates. The dates, he said, represent things like women's rights
and national unity that those negotiators have repeatedly said are sacred.
"But later, when they feel hungry," Mr. Hamdoun
said, laughing uproariously, "they will eat this god."
Easily the most flamboyant of the group is the
chain-smoking Mr. Mutlak, a soil scientist who made a fortune under Mr.
Hussein's government as an agricultural contractor but says he was expelled from
the Baath Party in the 1970's for refusing to support one of Mr. Hussein's
murderous purges.
That contention is met with skepticism from
Shiites who point out that Mr. Mutlak continues to maintain that Baath Party
principles are the still the best available for Iraq. He is also given to
ridiculing officials in the current Shiite-led government as ignorant and
lacking in the basic skills to run a nation.
Mahmood Othman, a Kurdish member of the
constitutional committee, said the Americans should not have brought in
negotiators like Mr. Mutlak. But because the Americans forced the issue, there
was no alternative but to negotiate with the Sunnis to the bitter end, he said.
"As long as you brought them in and said you
are going to do things through consensus," Mr. Othman said, "you have to deal
with it."
Dexter Filkins contributed
reporting from Baghdad for this article. |