Civilization vs.
Purification
By: Kamal Artin
Dec 13, 2006
Civilization and purification have a long history and are not limited to
an empire, culture, race, social class, and religion. Purification here
might be substituted with a less permissible word that describes
gratification of sexual urges of others for monetary gain. While
civilization tends to promote long term strengthening of a society’s
foundation, purification might serve the immediate gratification of
individuals with unusual urges. Some of the thinkers of an old school in
the East, such as the proponents of ‘Hilmism’ – ideas of Dr Fereydun
Hilmi, tend to put Western Civilization (WC) and its counterpart, Western
Purification (WP), in the same boat. Although they have W in common, it is
unjust to consider WP and WC as the same. Reviewing pros and cons of these
two phenomena is beyond the scope of this satire. Instead I try to
highlight some of the aspects of WP and WC that are relevant to the people
of my origin.
Despite their shallow pockets, most of the people of my origin have been
fighting for progressive universal values such as liberty, justice, and
equality for all. Some of these people allied themselves with the W forces
for a mutual immediate gratification; some did the same for adding to the
dept of our contemporary global civilization. While WC tends to be more
democratic and serve the humankind, WP has some gender biases and usually
is at the service of mankind, as evidenced by a lack of a significant
political power by the womankind. Interestingly like the womankind, the
people of my origin have been repeatedly looked upon as the second class
human beings by many leaders in the Middle East and few senior politicians
from the Wild West. The latest confirmation of such an attitude is evident
in the “Risk Intelligence” strategy suggested by David Apgar and a plan by
retired politicians such as Hamilton and Baker. The plan of these
boisterous seniors (BS), known as the BS plan, ignores the sacrifices and
hopes of the people of my origin in Kirkuk and other part of their divided
land to four infamous Middle Eastern countries.
The short version of the recommendation of these “experts” is that the
sociopath leaders of dominant ethnic groups in the Middle East, who have
been able to deepen their own pockets very successfully, are entitled to
keep the people of my origin as the second class citizens. These “experts”
who suffer from selective blindness, refuse to see that stability can not
exist without equality for all including for the people of my origin. They
refuse to see that these people have no intention to give up in their
fight for equality and independence until they have their own
representative in the United Nations.
My recommendation to Mr. Apgar is to make sure he had an Apgar score above
7 out of ten 10 at birth, since his recommended additional two Arab states
without one for the people of my origin is an insult to any free thinker
with an IQ score of more than 70%. To the seniors in the Ham-Baker group,
who know only the culture of hamburger and domination, I suggest they
learn form their peer, the retired boxer George Forman, who has
experienced domination and failure. Forman at this age is aware that he
will be more successful in the business of grilling ham instead of
unifying the artificial Iraq to remain a purified Arab state!
If Ham-Baker group and other W forces do not support the people of my
origin in fulfilling their dream of democratization and independence, soon
these people classify the Western civilizations as a purifying force that
sells itself to gratify the urges of Arab, Turk, and Persian purifiers.
Such classification would be an insult to all of those who voluntarily
have left their darkened home in the East for the enlightened hope of the
West. In the upcoming season of victory of light over darkness, I hope
every civilized activist and humanist joins the people of my origin in
supporting their rights of self determination!
Dr. Artin maintains the website: www.art-in-mind.net
|