|
KurdistanObserver.com
OP/ED pieces are restricted to
columnists who contribute their opinions solely to the Kurdistan Observer
The Policeman’s Fart, or the Politics of
Modern Iraq
23 September 2005
By: Sabah
Salih
This writing brought to mind
a Kurdish joke. One version goes like this: Long, long before the days of
modern transportation, deep in the snow-capped mountainous region of Kurdistan,
a beefy policeman on horseback arrives in a village of a few hundred to collect
the taxes. For the villagers, the policeman is the only face of government they
have ever seen; for the policeman, the visit is an opportunity to enjoy the
fruits of power. That night he sits down on a thick Kurdish carpet,
caliph-style, for a sumptuous dinner given in his honor, he in his western-style
uniform, his hosts in their baggy trousers tapered at the ankles, perfect for
floor sitting. As he maneuvers himself awkwardly to grab the choicest piece of
lamb, the policeman lets a fart, a hugely embarrassing and outrageously funny
thing in Kurdish culture. But nobody dares to laugh, for as the policeman
pointedly reminds his timid audience, “Laughing at the government’s fart is no
laughing matter.”
Up until the American
intervention, modern Iraq had been ruled, or I should say misruled, by men very
much like our farting policeman: always looking for one more opportunity to
enrich themselves, always trying to bring harm to whoever they chose as their
enemies, always demanding unconditional obedience to their authority, always
trying to mould their world into the narrowest totalities.
But perhaps these rulers’
biggest injustice was that they all had been operating with a big lie, the lie
by which they defined and marketed the country as a cohesive bastion of Arab
nationalism where in fact the country’s identity has always been too diverse
ethnically for any once race to make it exclusively its own. This fact, however,
has not prevented Sunni Arab political discourse from claiming the whole country
as their own, even justifying in its name a brutally thuggish campaign of
cultural theft and mass killing against the Kurdish people. Today a similar
campaign of brutally is being waged against all those on the Arab side who have
courageously decided to take a stand against this lie and help bring it once and
for all to an end.
But Sunni Arabs are not the
only ones committed to the preservation of this lie. Opponents of the war,
favoring simplifications over hard facts, cheap slogans over the resources of
logic and dialect, endorse the very same thing. From George Galloway’s hysterical
ramblings in defense of Iraq’s so-called Arab identity, you cannot tell whose
words you’re reading, Saddam Hussein’s or a British MP’s. Incredibly, even some
policy makers and pundits in Washington continue to define success in Iraq in
purely Sunni Arab terms: a strong centralized government in Baghdad. As is the
case with our farting policeman, here too for men like Francis Fukuyama and
Leslie Clark, it is the lie, not the country’s reality, that they want policies
to be based upon, just as the way it was during the long period of bad old days.
This is not just because the lie’s simplicity is much easier to grasp than
Iraq’s reality; it is also because, in an America obsessed with careerism and
how-to manuals, there is a great deal of pressure on such men to make themselves
relevant to an Iraq that has rendered them—and a whole slew of so-called Middle
East experts—irrelevant. To be fossilized by events into oblivion was the last
thing they’d expected from this war.
And now the lie’s defenders
have marshaled the twin powers of national identity and Arab nationalism in its
defense, with additional support coming from men and women in the west whose
lazy incapacities won’t allow them to see anything outside the box they are in.
On the face of it, the Sunni Arab opposition to the proposed constitution
appears to be an exercise in democracy. But in reality it is an effort to bring
back the very same old order, under which they were the farting policemen and
the majority was the nameless, voiceless, timid subjects that they had for so
long ruled over and treated very badly. Their ultimate goal is to once again
reduce Iraq’s diverse cultural identity to an all-encompassing Arab label, once
again to make Arab nationalism the country’s blueprint for national thinking,
once again to install themselves as the country’s farting policemen. This is
their definition of liberation and patriotism and one Iraq.
And they seem to be getting
some hearing from the Bush administration. For some in the administration these
are not the bad guys; the bad guys are the Kurds. These officials have even
gone as far as doing everything in their power—and thankfully failing—to get in
the way of Kurdish demand for federalism. They have now persuaded themselves
that if the Bush administration
fails to bring about a strong centralized government in Baghdad—i.e. bring back
the lie—the result will be a disaster, presumably for everyone.
But for these to be made the
primary considerations in trying to shape Iraq’s future means avoiding the facts
on the ground: Iraq is already and has always been divided along ethnic lines.
Now the country is almost exactly the way old Mesopotamia used to be before the
British came in and with brute force tried to fashion a nation-state out of it.
This division is too deep to bridge; it’s too late for that anyway. The lie
cannot be brought back.
So stop talking about saving
Iraq: Iraq has already been saved twice over, once from tyranny and once from a
big lie. Regardless of what the constitution says, events on the ground
indicate that the Kurds are going their separate ways: at the moment their push
is for democracy and secularism and federalism but down the road
self-determination is their goal, something they truly deserve. For their part,
most Shiites are heading in the direction of a theocracy modeled on Iran; the
groundwork for that is already in place. The Sunni Arabs, therefore, will have
no choice but to make do only with what they are entitled to under democracy,
the Sunni triangle. The days of their farting policeman are gone forever.
|
|