![]() |
|
|
|
news
headlines
|
US: Should Saddam Move Against the Kurds, We Would Respond The Washington Times
Ben Barber U.S. pledges protection for Kurds in Iraq Aug 10, 2002
The
United States agreed yesterday to protect Kurds in northern Iraq during any
operation to oust Saddam Hussein to avoid a repeat of an aborted 1991 uprising
that the Iraqi leader crushed. But
a senior U.S. official declined to say the United States would offer similar
protection to dissident Shi'ite Muslims in southern Iraq, who contend that
Washington abandoned them during their simultaneous 1991 uprising. The
official said that "should Saddam move against the Kurds, we would
respond." "Beyond
that, all is hypothetical," the official told reporters after a day of
meetings with six dissident Iraqi groups at the State Department to coordinate
strategy to oust Saddam. "We
realize these Iraqis are running risks," the official said of Shi'ite
Muslims, who occupy Iraq's southern marshlands. "That's
why we have in place Operation Northern Watch and Southern Watch," the
official said, speaking on the condition of anonymity. He was referring to
no-fly zones over northern and southern Iraq that are off-limits to Iraqi
aircraft and patrolled by American and British fighter jets. In
Baghdad, official Iraqi media warned that U.S. forces would be walking to their
own graves if the "cowboys" in Washington unleashed a military
campaign. "The
Iraqi people will make Iraq the graveyard of U.S. attackers and leave their
bodies to be devoured by wild animals," the official Al-Iraq newspaper
said. "The
Iraqi people will not disarm. They will go to the end to bring victory or die as
martyrs." In
Berlin, German Chancellor Gerhard Schroeder, a key U.S. ally, ruled out German
participation in a U.S.-led attack on Iraq, in an interview on public
television. "I
think that if there is military intervention, we should be cautious. That means
that Germany will not take part" in any US-led action against Iraq, Mr.
Schroeder told the ARD station. Despite
the clear signs of opposition in the ranks of allies, including public sentiment
and Britain's Labor Party's reluctance in Britain to go to war, the United
States stayed on the offensive in confronting Saddam. Defense
Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld said a long-standing U.S. strategy of using
economic sanctions and no-fly zones to contain Iraq is not working because it
still has weapons of mass destruction. "So
there is no way any reasonable person could look at that record and say that
it's worked. It hasn't worked. And it's not working," he said at a Pentagon
news conference. It
was Mr. Rumsfeld's most direct repudiation yet of the strategy pursued by the
U.S. government since the 1991 Persian Gulf war to keep the Iraqi leader in
check. After
the day of meetings at the State Department, the dissident Iraqi leaders issued
a statement saying, "The Iraqi opposition had productive meetings with
Undersecretary of State Marc Grossman and Undersecretary of Defense Douglas
Feith and agreed to work for the overthrow of the dictatorial regime in Iraq. "We
asked for the protection of all Iraqi people under U.N. resolutions," in
case threats or military action by the United States sparks repressive measures
by Saddam Hussein, said Hamid al Bayati, who represented the Supreme Council of
the Islamic Revolution in Iraq, reading from the statement. Mr.
Bayati's group primarily represents the Shi'ites in southern Iraq, who had been
reluctant to back the latest U.S. campaign because of its failed attempt to oust
Saddam in 1991. The
group, based in Iran, says it has 10,000 armed fighters ready to take on Saddam. The
Iraqi opposition leaders agreed yesterday to summon a conference in the near
future of all Iraqi opposition groups, including those unable to attend
yesterday's meetings. No
time or place for the conference was announced. Yesterday's
meeting sought to revive U.S. cooperation with the splintered opposition
movement. Congress
voted to spend $97 million on the Iraqi opposition, including some military
training and equipment, but the Clinton administration was reluctant to give out
the money. Failure
to provide reliable accounting for whatever funds were disbursed further
dampened enthusiasm for the Iraqi opposition. The
Iraqis at yesterday's meetings said they had major fears that they would be
abandoned by America and left to be picked off by Saddam. "The
question is, are the Americans serious? I think this administration is serious
to change the regime," said Mohammed Sabir Ismail of the Patriotic Union of
Kurdistan. "We
have had experiences in 1991," Mr. Ismail said, referring to the uprising
in which Saddam bombed the Kurds and his troops forced them to flee barefoot
into snow-covered mountains. He
cited a 1996 campaign by Saddam to crush an Iraqi opposition group operating in
the Kurdish region and an earlier Kurdish uprising, in 1975, that faltered after
initial sponsorship by the United States. Mr.
Ismail discounted warnings by Arab leaders that unless the Palestinian-Israeli
conflict is settled, it will be impossible to overthrow Saddam. "For
us, Iraq is important — the Iraqi people suffer too much," he said. What
most impressed the U.S. side, the administration official said, was that all the
six groups represented agreed on the need for a democratic, pluralistic Iraq
that would maintain the "territorial integrity" of the nation of 23
million people. Turkey
fears that an independent Iraqi Kurdish state would encourage Turkish Kurdish
separatists. And Arab countries, as well as the United States, fear that Shi'ite
Iraqis might be absorbed by Iran. The
opposition leaders' statement spoke of a "federal" government once
Saddam is replaced, reflecting a desire by the diverse ethnic and religious
groups such as Kurds, Sunnis, Shi'ites and others to have local control over
their regions. The
opposition leaders included Ahmad Chalabi of the Iraqi National Congress, Jalal
Talabani of the Patriotic Union of Kurdistan, Hoshyar Zebari of the Kurdistan
Democratic Party, Sharif Ali bin Hussein of the Constitutional Monarchy Movement
and Iyad Allawi of the Iraqi National Accord. In
a sign that Iran is quietly endorsing the Bush administration's moves to oust
Saddam — Iran's enemy from their 1980-1988 war — the leaders of the Supreme
Council of the Islamic Revolution in Iraq also attended the meeting yesterday by
traveling from Iran, where the group is based. The
opposition groups did not ask for military assistance, training or weapons
yesterday, the administration official said. The
Iraqi opposition leaders today are to hold a televised conference with Vice
President Richard B. Cheney, who is spending this month at his Wyoming
residence. Secretary
of State Colin L. Powell walked into the room and met the Iraqis during their
meeting at the State Department yesterday.
|