|
KurdistanObserver.com
Kurds Vow to Retain Militia as Guardians of
Autonomy
By
EDWARD WONG
February 27, 2005
The New
York Times
ARAI
SUBHAN AGHA, Iraq, Feb. 23 - The camouflage-clad militiamen marched down from
the mountains in four columns of hundreds each, stomping their boots in unison.
"Keep looking forward!" an officer yelled.
"Kurdistan or death!" the soldiers shouted at
once, their words thundering over the sound of heels striking the ground.
Here at a training camp in the eastern hills of
Iraqi Kurdistan, there is little doubt to whom these soldiers owe their
allegiance.
Many say their first loyalty lies with a major
Kurdish political party. Then they offer it to Kurdistan, the rugged autonomous
region in northern Iraq the size of Switzerland. There is little mention of the
nation of Iraq or the Iraqi Army.
"All of the peshmerga of Kurdistan, we're
fighting for Kurdistan," one of the soldiers, Fermen Ibrahim, 25, told a
visitor, calling the militia by its Kurdish name, which means "those who face
death."
As political jockeying rages in Baghdad to
determine the shape of the new government - how Islamic it will be, whether it
has strong or weak central powers - one of the most troublesome issues emerging
is whether political parties, especially those of the Kurds and Shiites, can
keep their private armies. Kurdish leaders say they intend to write into the new
constitution a system granting considerable powers to individual regions, one
that will legitimize their use of the peshmerga.
If the Kurds succeed, they will achieve the
right of regional powers to set up their own armies, possibly leading to
warlord-style fiefs across Iraq. Until their strong showing in the recent
national elections, Kurdish leaders appeared to agree, at least in public, with
the American goal of dismantling militias. Now they stand in open defiance of
it.
The peshmerga, with recruits from two Kurdish
parties, total about 100,000 soldiers. A source of ethnic pride, they
tenaciously fought against Saddam Hussein and are now relied upon by American
commanders to battle the Arab-led insurgency in the north. Perhaps most
important in the current power vacuum, they provide Kurdish leaders with armed
backing in their demands for broad autonomy.
"We want to keep our peshmerga because they are
a symbol of resistance," said Massoud Barzani, the leader of the Kurdistan
Democratic Party and the son of Mustafa Barzani, a revered Kurdish leader who
founded the peshmerga in the 1960's. "It's not a matter to be discussed or
negotiated."
If the Kurds get the constitution they want,
the peshmerga would nominally fall under the oversight of the Ministry of
Defense in Baghdad, Kurdish officials say, but in reality would be controlled by
regional commanders. The two Kurdish parties each have a ministry of peshmerga,
which they say they intend to keep.
The Kurds also say the peshmerga will maintain
all the trappings of a conventional army, with an officers' college, training
camps and armor and artillery units all operating independently of the rest of
the Iraqi security forces.
The major Shiite parties, who have the largest
share of seats in the constitutional assembly, may try to block the Kurds on the
militia issue to limit the autonomy of the Kurds. But those parties have
significant militias that they may seek to keep, or to at least incorporate into
the Iraqi security forces as intact units. Their armies generally stay hidden on
the streets of Baghdad but have been active in the Shiite heartland of the
south, operating checkpoints and patrols and, in some cases, enforcing strict
Islamic law, like cracking down on alcohol vendors.
The leaders of the Supreme Council for the
Islamic Revolution in Iraq, a powerful Shiite party, have said repeatedly that
the party's Iranian-trained armed wing, the Badr Organization, at least 15,000
strong, can help provide security in the new Iraq.
The former governing Sunni Arabs, a minority
now feeling threatened by the other groups, will probably oppose any move by the
Kurds and Shiites to legitimize their militias.
American commanders publicly say that all armed
groups in Iraq must be state sponsored and that militarized units should not be
organized by ethnicity or sect. But they privately acknowledge the extreme
difficulties of breaking up the militias. Lt. Col. Eric Durr, the head of civil
affairs for the 42nd Infantry Division, charged with overseeing eastern
Kurdistan, said it was now up to the new Iraqi government to figure out what to
do with the militias.
"It's really a political issue for the Iraqi
government to work out," he said.
The Americans are relying on the peshmerga to
fight insurgents. Across the north, particularly in the besieged city of Mosul,
American commanders have supported Iraqi officials in deploying large units of
armed Kurds into the streets.
But the peshmerga also exemplify the pitfalls
of private armies - in the mid-1990's, the militias of the two Kurdish parties
turned their guns on each other in a civil war that left at least 3,000 dead.
"What I see happening now in Iraq is the
potential drift toward warlordism," said Larry Diamond, a former adviser to the
Coalition Provisional Authority, which tried but failed to disband militias
before handing sovereignty to the Iraqis last June.
"If things go bad," he added, "if the center
does not hold, if ethnic and regional divisions are not well and carefully
managed by the country's political leaders, particularly at the center, then the
existence of all these militias - both those preceding the handover of power and
those that have arisen in recent months - could facilitate the descent of the
country into some kind of Lebanon-style civil war."
The presence of the peshmerga "is bound to
strengthen the resolve of Kurdish political leaders not to yield on their
demands for far-reaching autonomy," said Mr. Diamond, a senior fellow at the
Hoover Institution at Stanford University.
The peshmerga are everywhere in Iraqi Kurdistan
- along the highways, atop government buildings, riding in convoys. They wear a
hodgepodge of uniforms, from traditional baggy outfits to desert camouflage
hand-me-downs from the United States Army. There is one thing that appears to be
consistent, though: they think of themselves as Kurds first and Iraqis second.
"If I work hard to protect my people and my
cities, indirectly I'll serve Iraq," Col. Mehdi Dosky, 44, the commander of the
training camp here, said as he sat behind his desk in a dark green Iraqi Army
uniform. Two officers on a couch pored over evaluation forms of the trainees. A
map on one wall showed the theoretical pan-Kurdish nation that Kurds in the
Middle East hope to carve out one day - a huge territory stretching from the
Mediterranean to western Iran and taking in large parts of Turkey, Syria, Iraq
and Iran.
"We don't think it's a good idea to disband our
army," said Colonel Dosky, whose father served as a peshmerga from the militia's
first days. "We want to keep our forces and have them protect our region. The
Kurds will protect their area, and other people will use their forces to protect
their own areas. There are too many ethnic and religious problems right now in
Iraq."
The American dependence on such proxy armies is
clearest in Mosul, where Kurds make up nearly a quarter of the population. In
November, Sunni Arab rebels overran police stations and forced thousands of
officers to quit, and the Arab governor requested the aid of two Kurdish
battalions of the Iraqi National Guard.
Brig. Gen. Carter Ham, the head of Task Force
Olympia, the American force which until last week was charged with controlling
Mosul, used Kurds to guard his headquarters.
But the presence of an ethnic or sect-based
militia in a diverse city can quickly inflame tensions.
Such is the case in Kirkuk, the oil-rich city
where Kurds, Arabs and Turkmen uneasily live side by side. At the request of
Arabs and Turkmen, the American military asked peshmerga to leave the city after
Mr. Hussein fell. Last summer, Kurdish officials said, the Americans allowed 300
pesh merga to return temporarily to fight insurgents.
"Always, it's a sensitive issue," said Suphi
Sabir, a senior official in the Iraqi Turkmen Front, the most prominent Turkmen
party in Kirkuk. "But we won't start a fight over it because the result would be
very bad."
Warzer Jaff contributed reporting from
Mosul, Iraq, for this article. |