|
OP/ED pieces are
restricted to columnists who contribute their opinions solely to the
Kurdistan Observer
KurdistanObserver.com
Building An Iraq
Of Equals
By: Dr Nazhad Khasraw
Hawramany
nhawramany@yahoo.com
Mar 5, 2005
The
Kurdistani parties which came with 77 seats as the the second strongest
parliamentary block in the new Iraqi National Assembly, trailing
after the Shiite block( so-called Sistani block) which won 140 seats of
the 275 seats of the assembly,in the aftermath of the historic and
milestone Iraqi elections of January 30 2005.
The Shiite Alliance
is a mix of several religious and secular parties, mostly Arab Shiites,
was involved in bitter internal bickering to chose their candidate for
the influential post of prime minister, this internal bickering and
rivalry between Ibrahim Aljaafari ( Da`Awa Party), Ahmad Alchalabi (
Iraqi National Congress), Adil Abdulmahdi ( Supreme Council of Islamic
Revolution in Iraq), Hussein Alsharistani a technocrat with close
association to Ayatuaalah Sistani has nearly caused a rift in the ranks
of the alliance with threats of dissolution of the alliance.
At the end the Shiite
block did nominate Dr Ibrahim Aljaafari for the post of prime minister
and he was given the task of trying to forge an alliance with either the
Kurdish block or Mr Allawi, the interim prime minister which won only
40 seats.
According to TAL (
Transitional Administrative Law of Iraq), a two thirds majority is
needed to appoint a president and two deputies which in turn will
nominate a prime minister and cabinet. This simply means that the whole
process needs a consensus and agreement between those different
factions.
Taking into
consideration the rivalry and bitter exchange of accusations between the
Sistani block and Allawi block, the Kurdistani block has emerged as the
kingmakers of the politics in the new post-Saddam Iraq. The Kurds have a
clear vision and a concrete set of demands, which represents the cutoff
value for Kurdish demands, beyond which an alliance with the Shiites is
impossible.
These demands
include:
1. the recognition of
the federal solution for the region of Iraqi Kurdistan (including
Kirkuk) as the model of relation of Iraqi Kurdistan with the rest of
Arab Iraq, this federation must hat have wide authority and a loose
connection with the central federal government in Baghdad.
This agreement must be clearly enshrined in the permanent constitution
that will be drafted by the new national assembly and must be backed by
international guaranties similar to the model of South Sudan agreement
with Sudan government. There should be a clear understanding of the
division of wealth in Iraq and also of authorities of federal regions
and central federal government
2. The problems of
ethnic cleansing and Arabisation in Kurdistani cities like Kirkuk,
Shekhan, Shangar, Makhmour and Khanaquin, during decades of chauvinistic
Baath rule must be addressed immediately according to article 58 of TAL,
and not postponed till the writing of the new constitution as the
Shiites point out. The deported Kurds must be allowed back to their
ancestral cities without delay and compensated for their material and
emotional suffering. All the Arab settlers which were brought in by the
successive Arab central governments in a deliberate action to abolish
the Kurdish majority in those Kurdistani oil rich and agricultural rich
areas must be given incentives to go back to their original places in
South and Central Iraq. The municipalities of Kirkuk which were
dismembered and forcibly annexed to other governorates only to dissolute
the Kurdish majority like Chamchamal, Kifri, Kalar and Tuzkhurmatu must
be rejoined to Kirkuk and the future of Kirkuk decided through a
referendum of the population in Kirkuk and other areas. The Shiite block
is clearly trying to cheat the Kurds on this issue, especially that the
majority of those Arab settlers are Shiites. The Kurds can't accept this
injustice to be enforced on them, especially if one takes into
consideration that all the internal wars with the successive Arab Iraqi
governments including that of Saddam was about Kirkuk and Autonomy.
Failing to reach a compromise on this issue is a recipe for further
stability and chaos in Iraq and alienation of Kurds.
3. The Kurds are the
most experienced and veteran political factions in the new Iraq. The
Kurds see democracy and secularism as the only way which keeps Iraq away
from disintegration and chaos. They are not ready to compromise in any
way on the issue of separation of religion from state and are vehemently
against building an Islamic state in Iraq. The Kurds do acknowledge that
the majority of Iraqis are Muslims and that Islam can be acknowledged as
a source of legislation in Iraq but certainly not as the only or the
dominant source. The Shiites have been deliberately vague on this issue
but several signals and hints showed their covert efforts to impose an
Islamic system with close links to Iran in Iraq. Again Kurds are not
ready to compromise on this issue taking into consideration the horrible
Islamic experiments of Iran, Afghanistan and Saudi Arabia.
4. The Kurds have a
very traumatic experience with Iraqi Army and Iraqi intelligence
agencies during the successive Arab governments which ruled Iraq since
the establishment of Iraqi state in 1921. The main bulk of the Iraqi
army which perpetrated all the heinous atrocities in Kurdistan including
the burning and demolition of 4500 villages and hamlets, gassing of
Halabja 1988, Anfal genocide campaigns 1986-1988 , were Arab Sunnis and
Arab Shiites alike. The Kurds have struggled against the Arab
chauvinistic mentality in Iraq irrespective of the facts that their
adversaries were Sunnis ore Shiites. The Kurds are not ready to repeat
the same atrocities again , only this time on the hands of Islamic Arab
Shiites. Taking into consideration this tragic experience with the Arab
Iraqi army, the Kurds are adamant that they keep their army of well
trained and well disciplined Peshmerga forces and change them to
security forces and border units that protects the borders of Iraqi
Kurdistan. It is this force which is keeping Kurdistan as a safe haven
amidst the wave of killings and suicidal explosions in the rest of Iraq.
The Peshmerga forces enjoy the respect and love of the Kurdish
population and they should be converted to an Iraqi army that is
stationed only in Kurdistan. No Arab Iraqi troops are welcome in Iraqi
Kurdistan without prior agreement with the regional government of
Kurdistan.
The Arab hegemonies
and chauvinistic mentality is the same regardless if they were Sunni
Arabs or Shiite Arabs and the Kurds are seeking legislative and
international guarantees that will safeguard their rights ant they will
be treated as equals in Iraq, otherwise why should the Kurds try to
build a new chauvinistic state which at the end will turn against the
very basic rights of Kurds. Our American friends and international
community should have open eyes and ears about what is going on in Iraq.
There should be no sell out of Kurds ever again.
nhawramany@yahoo.com
Dr Nazhad Khasraw
Hawramany
Switzerland |