|
KurdistanObserver.com
Judge Orders Release of Kurdish Immigrant
Accused of Terrorism
May 20, 2005
DETROIT (AP) -- A federal judge on Friday
ordered the release of a jailed Kurdish immigrant while he appeals his
deportation on terrorism charges, praising him as "a model immigrant" and
questioning the government's motives.
U.S. District Judge Avern Cohn ruled that
Ibrahim Parlak should be freed on $50,000 bond. Parlak, 43, has been in jail
since his July 29 arrest and is appealing an immigration judge's December order
to deport him to Turkey.
Cohn said the complexities of Parlak's case
mean he is likely to be held for an unreasonable period and noted his strong
community ties in the Lake Michigan resort town of Harbert, where he lives and
owns a restaurant.
"He has been a model immigrant vigorously
asserting his right to remain in the United States. He is not a threat to anyone
nor a risk of flight," the judge wrote. "Under these circumstances, there is
simply no good reason to deny him his freedom pending completion of the removal
proceedings."
Cohn said Parlak's release would be postponed
for 10 days to give the government a chance to appeal.
Greg Palmore, a spokesman for the U.S.
Department of Homeland Security in Detroit, said Immigration and Customs
Enforcement officials were aware of the decision and were "considering all
options."
The government attorneys who represented ICE in
federal court declined to comment.
"For Ibrahim, this restores his faith in the
American justice system," Parlak attorney Jay Marhoefer said after speaking to
him from the Calhoun County Jail in Battle Creek.
Marhoefer said it is rare for a federal judge
to grant a petition for release to someone involved in immigration proceedings.
He said he had not expected a favorable ruling to come so quickly, given that
Parlak's legal team only filed its final brief on Wednesday.
U.S. Sen. Carl Levin, who has voiced support
for Parlak on the Senate floor, welcomed Friday's news. "Judge Cohn did the
right thing," the Michigan Democrat said.
In his order, Cohn said there was no evidence
that Parlak's case had been unduly dragged out up to this point.
However, Cohn noted an apparent "piling on of
charges" by the government. Parlak was initially charged with lying on an
immigration form about his conviction in Turkey for separatism; other charges,
including terrorism, were added later.
"The manner in which Petitioner's case has
proceeded, or rather escalated, raises suspicion as to the actions of ICE under
the circumstances. Once Petitioner was labeled a terrorist, the proceedings took
on a decidedly more complex, if not high-profile, aura," he wrote.
The government wants to deport Parlak, who was
granted asylum in 1992, because of his past ties to the Kurdistan Workers'
Party, or PKK, in Turkey. The U.S. State Department classified the PKK as a
terrorist group in 1997.
The Department of Homeland Security says Parlak
did not disclose important details about his separatist activities in his
original asylum application and also omitted his conviction in Turkey from
subsequent immigration forms.
Parlak's supporters say he was never involved
in violence. His lawyers point out that the Turkish security court system that
convicted him has since been abolished because of international pressure. Human
rights groups say the courts relied on confessions extracted by torture.
In December, following a two-day hearing in
U.S. Immigration Court in Detroit, Judge Elizabeth Hacker ruled that the
government had sufficiently proved its case and ordered Parlak deported. His
case now is pending before the Board of Immigration Appeals.
Both the immigration court and the appeals
board are part of the Department of Justice. If Parlak loses his case before the
board, he can bring it to the federal court system by appealing to the Sixth
Circuit Court of Appeals.
The government had said Parlak should remain in
jail while his case winds through the system, arguing that he is subject to a
federal law providing for the mandatory detention of criminal and terrorist
aliens. Parlak's lawyers argued that the law does not apply to him because the
allegations involve events that are too old.
Parlak's case has inspired strong support in
and around Harbert, where he owns Cafe Gulistan, a Kurdish restaurant.
His friends were euphoric Friday.
"Based on the arguments and the Constitution
and justice, you expect justice to be done, but with our past experience with
this case, we didn't know," said Martin Dzuris, a spokesman for Parlak's
supporters. |